Simulations with precise spike times¶
The simulation resolution h and the minimum synaptic transmission delay dmin define the two major time intervals of the scheduling and simulation flow of NEST: neurons update their state variables in steps of h, whereas spikes are communicated and delivered to their targets in steps of dmin, where dmin is a multiple of h.
Traditionally, spikes are constrained to the simulation grid such that neurons can propagate their state variables for an entire h-step without interruption by incoming spikes. This enables faster simulations of neurons with linear sub-threshold dynamics as a precomputed propagator matrix for a time step of fixed size h can be employed (Rotter & Diesmann, 1999).
Neurons buffer the incoming spikes until they become due, where spikes can be lumped together provided that the corresponding synapses have the same postsynaptic dynamics. Within a dmin-interval, each neuron independently proceeds in steps of h: it retrieves the inputs that are due in the current time step from its spike buffers and updates its state variables such as the membrane potential.

Figure 16 Propagation of membrane potential in case of grid-constrained spiking. Filled dots indicate update of membrane potential; black cross indicates detection of threshold crossing. As visual guidance, dashed black curves indicate time course of membrane potential. For simplicity, d_min=2h.¶
If after an update the membrane potential is above the firing threshold, the neuron emits a spike and resets its membrane potential. Due to time discretization both spike and reset happen at the right border of the h-step in which the threshold crossing occurred; the spike is time stamped accordingly.
NEST enables also simulations with precise spike times, which are represented by an integer time stamp and a double precision offset. As the incoming spikes divide the h-steps into substeps, a neuron needs to update its state variables for each substep.

Figure 17 Propagation of membrane potential in case of off-grid spiking. Dashed red line indicates precise time of threshold crossing.¶
If after an update the membrane potential is above the firing threshold, the neuron determines the precise offset of the outgoing spike with respect to the next point on the time grid. This grid point marks the spike’s time stamp. The neuron then emits the spike and resets its membrane potential.
Models with precise spike times in NEST¶
poisson_generator_ps
creates Poissonian spike trains, where spike
times have an integer time stamp and a double precision offset. It is
hence dedicated to simulations with precise spike times. The device can
also be connected to grid-constrained neuron models, which only use the
time stamps of the spikes and ignore their offsets. However, spike
generation with poisson_generator_ps
is less efficient than with its
grid-constrained counterpart poisson_generator
.
parrot_neuron_ps
repeats the incoming spikes just as its
grid-constrained counterpart parrot_neuron
, but it is able to
represent precise spike times.
iaf_psc_delta_ps
is an integrate-and-fire neuron model with
delta-shaped postsynaptic currents that employs precise spike times;
its grid-constrained counterpart is iaf_psc_delta
. In this model the
precise location of an outgoing spike is determined analytically.
iaf_psc_alpha_ps
is an
integrate-and-fire neuron model with alpha-shaped postsynaptic
current that employ precise spike times; The grid-constrained
counterpart is iaf_psc_alpha
. The neuron models have been developed
in the context of Morrison et al.
(2007). As the model
employ interpolation in order to determine the precise location of an
outgoing spike, the achieved precision depends on the simulation
resolution h. The models differ in the way they process incoming
spikes, which also affects the attained precision (see Morrison et al.
(2007) for details).
iaf_psc_exp_ps
is an integrate-and-fire neuron model with
exponentially shaped postsynaptic currents that employs precise spike
times; its grid-constrained counterpart is iaf_psc_exp
. It has been
developed in the context of Hanuschkin et al.
(2010), which is a
continuation of the work presented in Morrison et al.
(2007). As the neuron
model employs an iterative search in order to determine the precise
location of an outgoing spike, the achieved precision does not depend on
the simulation resolution h. The model can also be used through the
PyNN interface.
Questions and answers about precise neurons¶
During the review process of the above mentioned papers, we came up with a list of questions and answers pertaining to the implementation and usage of precise spiking neurons. This list can be found here.